[Cosmo-dev] Cosmo planning status

[Ted Leung]

Yep - the only thing that is tripping us up here is the terminology,  
which I'm happy to change.    We can either do this next Thursday, or  
I'd be happy if people made proposals on the list, since no everyone  
is in the release meeting.

On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:01 PM, Priscilla Chung wrote:

> Yes agreed. Part of this confusion is because we have not had a  
> release/planning meeting for Cosmo. We can address this when we  
> meet next Thursday, since some people are still out this week. Does  
> that sound okay for everyone?
>
> -Priscilla
>
> On Sep 26, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
>
>> I think much of the confusion has been around us using the  
>> terminology differently on the Cosmo end. We should probably sit  
>> down and align our terminology or choose a different set of terms  
>> for cosmo if we intend to do the release management and milestones  
>> differently on cosmo -- which I imagine we will.
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/attachments/20060926/ba4db2bd/attachment.htm