[Cosmo-dev] Cosmo 0.5 status

[Bobby Rullo]

I'm in favor of option 2).

I think delivering a recurrence as it is right now would probably  
just come across as broken, but we also need to move forward on 0.6  
stuff.

Bobby


On Oct 16, 2006, at 5:04 PM, Randy Letness wrote:

> Brian Moseley wrote:
>>
>> i don't mind slipping the release until all the work is done. if  
>> randy
>> has nothing to do, he can get started specing out morse code.
>> similarly bobby can start specing out timezones if he is done with
>> recurrence.
>
> I'm finishing up packaging the docs into snarf (cosmo-docs webapp),
> and it looks like the rest of the bugs are 0.6.  I can either help you
> out with your bugs or get started on the sharing fun.
>
> -Randy
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev