[Cosmo-dev] Bugzilla: General Component

[Priscilla Chung]

On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Ted Leung wrote:

> I think that things are working fine as they are now, so I don't  
> see a need to change this.  I have watches for the cosmo dev team's  
> bugs, so I am up on what is going on.   If Brian gets tired of  
> doing this, I am happy to pick up the task.

Ok that's fine. I was just asking that's all.

>
>>
>>> Looks like we're missing 'To be assigned' as in Chandler, should  
>>> that
>>> default to Miikeal and reviewed during bug council?
>>
>> i don't think the bug council, as i've experienced it in the last few
>> weeks, is terribly useful until the later part of the development
>> cycle. i'm not sure how "to be assigned" is used in chandler, but i'm
>> happy with how we're doing things on our side of the house now and
>> don't see any need for more process :)
>
> Let's fix this problem when we actually have it.
Ok. Not trying to implement more process here–honest! Basically I  
have problems when I'm not sure which component to file a bug to–for  
now I'll just assign them to 'General'.

> I do think that we may need to change the frequency of the bug  
> council if we succeed in reducing our release cycle time.  But  
> since we haven't succeeded at that goal yet, we don't have the  
> problem.
Agreed.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/attachments/20061016/0d3be5f8/attachment.htm