[Cosmo-dev] Bugzilla: General Component
twl at osafoundation.org
Mon Oct 16 16:42:16 PDT 2006
On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:14 PM, Brian Moseley wrote:
> On 10/16/06, Priscilla Chung <priscilla at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>> I was filing bugs, and noticed that 'General', in Components defaults
>> to BCM and I was wondering if it should be going to Ted, instead? My
>> understanding is that 'General' means it touches various parts of the
>> application and not just one component, is that correct?
> or that the bug's area is too narrow to be considered a component in
> its own right.
> generally i distribute the bugs, not ted, which is why i'm the owner
> for that component specifically as well as many others.
I think that things are working fine as they are now, so I don't see
a need to change this. I have watches for the cosmo dev team's bugs,
so I am up on what is going on. If Brian gets tired of doing this,
I am happy to pick up the task.
>> Looks like we're missing 'To be assigned' as in Chandler, should that
>> default to Miikeal and reviewed during bug council?
> i don't think the bug council, as i've experienced it in the last few
> weeks, is terribly useful until the later part of the development
> cycle. i'm not sure how "to be assigned" is used in chandler, but i'm
> happy with how we're doing things on our side of the house now and
> don't see any need for more process :)
Let's fix this problem when we actually have it. I do think that we
may need to change the frequency of the bug council if we succeed in
reducing our release cycle time. But since we haven't succeeded at
that goal yet, we don't have the problem.
More information about the cosmo-dev