[Cosmo-dev] Bugzilla: General Component
bcm at osafoundation.org
Mon Oct 16 16:14:04 PDT 2006
On 10/16/06, Priscilla Chung <priscilla at osafoundation.org> wrote:
> I was filing bugs, and noticed that 'General', in Components defaults
> to BCM and I was wondering if it should be going to Ted, instead? My
> understanding is that 'General' means it touches various parts of the
> application and not just one component, is that correct?
or that the bug's area is too narrow to be considered a component in
its own right.
generally i distribute the bugs, not ted, which is why i'm the owner
for that component specifically as well as many others.
> Looks like we're missing 'To be assigned' as in Chandler, should that
> default to Miikeal and reviewed during bug council?
i don't think the bug council, as i've experienced it in the last few
weeks, is terribly useful until the later part of the development
cycle. i'm not sure how "to be assigned" is used in chandler, but i'm
happy with how we're doing things on our side of the house now and
don't see any need for more process :)
More information about the cosmo-dev