[Cosmo-dev] Bugzilla Cosmo Product Version Changes

[Mike Taylor]

On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote:

> We had discussed in bug council previously that the "FUTURE" version 
> should be removed, as issues should be logged against the version of 
> cosmo being used (which makes "FUTURE" an impossibility). Note: Target 
> milestone "FUTURE" obviously still remains.
>
> I removed the milestone but met some resistance. Also, I want to open 
> up the question of what the default version should be for new bugs, 
> should it be the current released version or the current Trunk 
> version? Chandler defaults to "unspecified" but I think that is a bad 
> idea since we'll most likely loose the version people are logging 
> against when bugs come from people outside of OSAF.

Having the version show "unspecified" and *knowing* that the person 
didn't or doesn't know the version is better than them all being set to 
a value and having no clue as to which one is wrong.

---
Bear

Build and Release Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
bear at osafoundation.org
http://www.osafoundation.org

bear at code-bear.com
http://code-bear.com

PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111  D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/attachments/20061009/722e6098/PGP.pgp