[Cosmo-dev] Bug Roundup

[Randy Letness]

Brian Moseley wrote:
>
> is there a reason we can't assume that a stale object exception ==
> concurrent modification by another request? even in the case of
> multiple cosmo instances, hibernate in instance B will notice that the
> version number in the database has suddenly advanced when it goes to
> save request B.
Right, but you don't get the exception until you try to save.  At that
point you are screwed.  Ideally you want to block the request until
the first request is done.

-Randy