[Cosmo-dev] acegi ACL implementation - more thoughts

[Randy Letness]

Brian Moseley wrote:
> On 11/21/06, Vinubalaji Gopal <vinu at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> so if everyone agrees on using jdbc for acl, we could go ahead with it.
>> If you feel that if we can get the same kind of performance using
>> hibernate, then I could have those implementations now.
>
> i don't see any major advantages to doing acls with hibernate, so i
> vote that we go ahead and use jdbc until we find a compelling reason
> to stop and use hibernate instead.
I'm confused.  Are we talking about using two persistence apis (one for 
ACLs using straight jdbc and one for rest of the model using 
hibernate)?  This might be confusing because ACLs are associated to 
Items and ACEs to Users right?  Items and Users are managed by 
hibernate, and ACLs would be managed by some other acegi jdbc 
framework?  This seems like a bad idea, but I need to look at the acegi 
stuff closer.

-Randy