[Cosmo-dev] Re: [Design] [Cosmo][Proposal] Defer Free busy
display feature in Cosmo 0.6
br at osafoundation.org
Tue Nov 14 10:36:52 PST 2006
On Nov 14, 2006, at 10:31 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:
> On 11/14/06, Priscilla Chung <priscilla at osafoundation.org> wrote:
> however. i see no evidence to back up your claim that building
> free-busy ui would take time away from other higher priority features.
> looking at the 0.6 time estimates page, that feature fits easily into
> the schedule - neither bobby nor matt is the critical path. indeed, i
> think bobby's estimate is extremely pessimistic - i'd say it's more
> like one or two days of effort for his part.
I am being pessimistic - I was worried about a part of the spec I am
not familiar with, and also about the complexity of the algorithm
that collapses overlapping events into free time blocks.
And I have to concur with Brian in saying that if it fits into the
schedule why cut it, unless other more important stuff starts taking
> even if there was a timing issue - i never once claimed that free-busy
> ui was more important than any other feature on the schedule, and i
> would have been the first to say cut it if it was clear that there was
> a scheduling conflict.
> i think what you're really probably saying is that ppd have other
> things they'd rather think about. fine. it's okay to say that without
> bringing the development and qa schedule into it.
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
More information about the cosmo-dev