[Cosmo-dev] Sharing Format discussions..

[Brian Moseley]

On 5/23/06, John Townsend <johntownsend at mac.com> wrote:

> Proposed Staging
> - Investigate cosmo sync performance

i don't recall talking about this. can somebody refresh my memory?

> 1. Has anyone done any work towards the items on the proposed staging list?

nope, have been focused on cosmo freebusy support.

> 3. Is this list of actions complete? I am not sure it is.

i think it's a complete high level list that will be decomposed over time.

> 4. We talked about XML/RDF, Cloud XML, and micro formats. We need a proposal
> to start the discussion on the sharing format? Does anyone have a strawman
> they are willing to float?

*waits for morgen*

> 5. What about the protocol? Are we set on DAV as the protocol for sharing?

i think it's the intelligent default choice. i'm happy to look at any
other proposals.

> 6. What concrete steps can we take to move this effort forward?

from the cosmo perspective - i'd like to look at the complete list of
requirements from chandler, foxmarks, interop with
ical/evolution/sunbird/lightning, and whatever else i've forgotten,
and assign priorities. i don't want to fall into the trap of stopping
on a dime and forgetting about earlier plans because of a flavorful
new feature of the week :)

btw - i think the non-osaf people on this list deserve to know what
the hell we are talking about!