[Cosmo] Free/Busy in Chandler 0.7

[Morgen Sagen]

Comments about B) and E) below...


On Mar 7, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Jeffrey Harris wrote:
>
> B) Chandler calculates free-busy based on what's in My Calendar and
> periodically updates a collection of VFREEBUSY components.
>
> VFREEBUSY components are more compact than full VEVENTs, so the
> upload-twice problem is diminished somewhat.  It still suffers from
> non-Chandler propagation delays.

+1, and I think a slight delay is not a big deal.

>
> E) Apparently semantics will be added to CalDAV in the next month  
> or so
> that setting a particular property on a calendar collection will  
> prevent
> events in that collection from being included in free/busy  
> reports.  Use
> those when they're implemented in Cosmo.
>
> In this scenario, Chandler just won't support Marilyn publishing  
> "Events
> managed for Lorenzo" in her own account without screwing up her
> free/busy until Cosmo adds these semantics, but that's not a crucial
> 0.7alpha2 use case, and there's a reasonable path between here and  
> there.
>
> This scenario still suffers from free/busy not being perfectly up to
> date if "Sally's soccer practice" changes, but at least changes to
> "Work" and "Home" are reflected immediately in her free/busy.
>
> Conclusion
> ==========
>
> As you might guess, I think we should do E).  This means creating a
> "Publish my Free/Busy information" menu item which creates an  
> "events in
> My Calendar not otherwise published" collection (more reasonable name
> suggestions welcome) which gets published along with other  
> collections.

It's not clear to me how such a collection is computed.  :-)

But since I am hearing that we will want Scooby to have access to our  
calendars even if we haven't shared them with others (which I guess  
makes sense), we're going to need to publish all our calendars to  
Cosmo anyway, so therefore we won't have to compute the "EIMCNOP"  
collection.  If/when Cosmo implements the 'free/busy collection  
property' feature you describe in E), then it seems like then you  
would want a checkbox within Chandler for each collection indicating  
whether or not the collection should be included in free/busy report,  
and if that collection is not already shared to the Cosmo server on  
which their free/busy info will live, the collection will get  
published, and the free/busy collection property is set to  
'include'.  If the collection is already shared on that Cosmo server,  
then the free/busy collection property is toggled appropriately.

One other thing to take into account is whether people will have  
their calendars distributed on multiple servers.  I know I will have  
my work calendar on an OSAF cosmo instance but my personal calendar  
will likely be on my own cosmo, which means I couldn't use option  
E).  Option B) would still work in that case though.  Also, in option  
B), does it need to be a collection, or would a monolithic ICS file do?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/attachments/20060307/b5effca1/attachment.html