[Cosmo-dev] Re: [Scooby-dev] Cosmo/Scooby Merge (Please read and comment)

[Brian Moseley]

On 7/14/06, Mikeal Rogers <mikeal at osafoundation.org> wrote:
> One thing I wanted to bring up in this thread that I know was brought
> up in one of our meetings but not on this thread is the viability of
> running scooby without cosmo.
>
> We are saying "you will still be able to cosmo without scooby" but
> we're also saying "you won't be able to run scooby without cosmo".
>
> If an outside developer wanted to use scooby without cosmo they would
> have to re-implement all of scooby-interface.
>
> I don't think this really matters, I certain don't see a problem with
> it, but I wanted to make sure it was on the list.

thanks. i too don't see it as an issue. as i mentioned before, our
goals for scooby have changed over the last year. the architecture
still allows for remote caldav access to be added back at a later
date, when somebody needs it and is willing to maintain that code.