[Cosmo] Re: [Scooby] integrated server bundle proposal

Brian Moseley bcm at osafoundation.org
Wed Feb 8 16:00:26 PST 2006

On 2/8/06, Bobby Rullo <br at osafoundation.org> wrote:
> Well, if Scooby is dependent on .3 and you come out with a .2.8
> release or something.

well that particular example is irrelevant, but sure, if cosmo makes a
non-backwards-compatible change, then it doesn't make sense to update
snarf until scooby has evolved to support the new change.

we control that manually though, by choosing not to change the cosmo
dependency version in snarf's pom, so bear can fully automate the
process of building snarf releases, eg: when a cosmo or scooby release
happens, if snarf's pom has been updated to incorporate the new
dependency, then make a new snarf release.

More information about the Cosmo mailing list