[Scooby] Re: [Cosmo] A couple big ideas: cosmo release and server
mimi at osafoundation.org
Fri Feb 3 18:01:59 PST 2006
In the short-term how likely is it for pure Scooby end-users to be on
On Feb 3, 2006, at 5:56 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> Brian Moseley wrote:
>> On 2/3/06, Ted Leung <twl at osafoundation.org> wrote:
>>> I think that the sheer volume of traffic will make this
>>> impossible at
>>> some point. The amount of traffic will be a deterrent to people
>>> subscribing to a single list.
>> also, end users are defined differently for each project. the end
>> of cosmo is most likely a system administrator, which won't be true
>> for chandler. scooby will probably fall somewhere in between.
> Subscribing to two lists might be a deterrent to some users if they
> think of it as one product. Now, this is maybe where I'm out on a
> limb, the idea that we want to think of this as one coherent system
> from a user's perspective, and not completely loosely coupled
> projects that have little relationship to each other beyond using
> standard protocols.
> But agreed, a cosmo system administrator is a different population.
> Perhaps with scooby you have two distinct groups, those who want to
> host a scooby service and end users of our scooby service.
> Scooby mailing list
> Scooby at osafoundation.org
More information about the Cosmo