[Scooby] Re: [Cosmo] A couple big ideas: cosmo release and server project merge

[Brian Moseley]

On 2/3/06, Bobby Rullo <br at osafoundation.org> wrote:
> I'm not even sure if I like the idea of one svn module, regardless of
> whether we call it one project or not.

the issue is not our svn repo structure, which is already
satisfactory. it's a much larger question of identity.

> For the sake of community however, we can call everything one
> project, and have what is now Cosmo and Scooby (perhaps even
> Chandler!) be sub-projects. Think Apache Jakarta Commons - the
> Commons projects have a shared goal and vision, but various sub-
> projects (net, lang, validator) with their own release cycles.
> Another example is Microsoft Office.

i don't care if we call things apple, bob and caterpillar. it seemed
logical many months ago to have separate cosmo and scooby communities,
but i think time has shown that is an artificial separation.