[Cosmo-dev] simplifying eimml

[Brian Moseley]

On 12/1/06, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:

> That is, even if Cosmo and Chandler were sending true diffs, it's still
> necessary for Chandler to match the incoming diffs against the previous
> baseline record set - which means the baseline record set has to be either
> in-memory or indexed by record keys.  Using the item "envelopes" allows us
> to load only a subset of the baseline records at any one point in time.

then you're in favor of grouping records into "item states" in the
xml? if so, i'm fine with it too.