[Cosmo-dev] Re: Cosmo 0.5 Planning

[Ted Leung]

On Aug 28, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Bobby Rullo wrote:

> I like the idea of milestones, but not the ones ted proposed, since  
> the first one would again require new JCR work which I think we  
> should avoid like a particularly nasty variant of bubonic plague. I  
> was thinking more like:
>
> 	cosmo-0.5M1 - Hibernate work. No new features, no merge.
> 	cosmo-0.5M2 - Merge w/ Hibernate. TAFKAS* is fully functional,  
> with no new features, just the 0.2 feature set.
> 	cosmo-0.5 - New Features for TAFKAS (Stuff from Scooby 0.3 spec)

This is basically the directly to hibernate route, which I also  
favor, slightly.   RIght now, I think that we need to make sure that  
going that route will not disrupt the user facing goals for Cosmo 0.5.

Ted