[Cosmo-dev] Bugzilla adjusments for Cosmo/Scooby merge (please comment)

[John Townsend]

Based on Brian's feedback below, I have revised the plan on the wiki.  
You can find it here:

http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/ 
CosmoScoobyBugzillaMergeList

Please post any comments you might have on this on the list. Assuming  
that we get no other feedback, we're planning to execute this change  
tomorrow.

--> towns




On Aug 14, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:

> On 8/13/06, John Townsend <johntownsend at mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Here's a list of the Scooby components and a proposal on what to  
>> do with
>> each of them. This is based on everyone's feedback of merging the
>> appropriate components and moving the rest. Let me know what you  
>> think.
>> Unless someone has a serious objection, Bear and I plan to make  
>> this happen
>> sometime on Monday.
>
> i think these are much too granular. do we really have a need for
> "event collision", "overlay", "recurrence", "timezones"? how many end
> users will know to choose one of these components when reporting a
> bug? are we really going to need to sort reports or divide labor based
> on those distinctions? how about just "web ui", replacing "web
> console"? i'd even be satisfied with "calendar ui", "browsing ui",
> "admin ui".
>
> also, caldav4j and sharing service should have their own products.
> "snarf" should be renamed "server bundle". we should add "atom".
> remove "tickets/sharing" unless there's some really important
> distinction between that and dav. rename "auth and authz" to
> "security".
> _______________________________________________
> cosmo-dev mailing list
> cosmo-dev at lists.osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/attachments/20060814/1af74f55/attachment.html