[Cosmo-dev] Bugzilla adjusments for Cosmo/Scooby merge (please comment)

Brian Moseley bcm at osafoundation.org
Mon Aug 14 11:46:04 PDT 2006


On 8/13/06, John Townsend <johntownsend at mac.com> wrote:

> Here's a list of the Scooby components and a proposal on what to do with
> each of them. This is based on everyone's feedback of merging the
> appropriate components and moving the rest. Let me know what you think.
> Unless someone has a serious objection, Bear and I plan to make this happen
> sometime on Monday.

i think these are much too granular. do we really have a need for
"event collision", "overlay", "recurrence", "timezones"? how many end
users will know to choose one of these components when reporting a
bug? are we really going to need to sort reports or divide labor based
on those distinctions? how about just "web ui", replacing "web
console"? i'd even be satisfied with "calendar ui", "browsing ui",
"admin ui".

also, caldav4j and sharing service should have their own products.
"snarf" should be renamed "server bundle". we should add "atom".
remove "tickets/sharing" unless there's some really important
distinction between that and dav. rename "auth and authz" to
"security".


More information about the cosmo-dev mailing list