[Cosmo-dev] Scooby/Cosmo Merge approved.
priscilla at osafoundation.org
Tue Aug 1 13:58:49 PDT 2006
I have a few logistical questions:
1. Name of the project?
+ Outside of the branding project Pieter is driving, this is just
an internal project name we can refer to.
+ There has been a suggestion of dropping the Scooby name and
just referring the project to be named Cosmo.
2. Mailing lists?
+ There has been talk about merging the lists. We could
potentially place a tag in the subject line referring to [F] - Front
end and [B] - Back end/server side conversation.
3. IRC channels?
+ Are we going to merge the IRC channels?
4. Wiki pages?
+ Are we planning to merge all the information on the wiki pages?
Do we want to bother merging all the pages or the upcoming release
+ There will probably be further discussion about where the
schedule, features list, road map, documentation and coding standards
etc. is found on the wiki.
5. Merging the status meetings?
+ Currently the meetings are back to back. Most people in the
Cosmo meeting are attending the Scooby meeting. Is there a need to
merge the meeting so everyone is attending and listening to both
sides of the product? Could we possibly make the meetings more
In moving forward with the merge, from a planning perspective, I
think we've made the conscious decision to delay the next release–
which is fine. I just want clarification on what other additional
work needs to be done besides the development of the merge.
Have I missed any other outstanding issues?
On Jul 28, 2006, at 3:35 PM, John Townsend wrote:
> With that said, I think we can consider the merger approved and we
> should move forward.
More information about the cosmo-dev