[Cosmo-dev] Scooby/Cosmo Merge approved.

[Priscilla Chung]

I have a few logistical questions:

1. Name of the project?
    + Outside of the branding project Pieter is driving, this is just  
an internal project name we can refer to.
    + There has been a suggestion of dropping the Scooby name and  
just referring the project to be named Cosmo.

2. Mailing lists?
    + There has been talk about merging the lists. We could  
potentially place a tag in the subject line referring to [F] - Front  
end and [B] - Back end/server side conversation.

3. IRC channels?
    + Are we going to merge the IRC channels?

4. Wiki pages?
    + Are we planning to merge all the information on the wiki pages?  
Do we want to bother merging all the pages or the upcoming release  
pages?
    + There will probably be further discussion about where the  
schedule, features list, road map, documentation and coding standards  
etc. is found on the wiki.

5. Merging the status meetings?
    + Currently the meetings are back to back. Most people in the  
Cosmo meeting are attending the Scooby meeting. Is there a need to  
merge the meeting so everyone is attending and listening to both  
sides of the product? Could we possibly make the meetings more  
efficient?

In moving forward with the merge, from a planning perspective, I  
think we've made the conscious decision to delay the next release– 
which is fine. I just want clarification on what other additional  
work needs to be done besides the development of the merge.

Have I missed any other outstanding issues?
-Priscilla


On Jul 28, 2006, at 3:35 PM, John Townsend wrote:
>
> With that said, I think we can consider the merger approved and we  
> should move forward.