[chandler-users] Unscheduled 'to do' lists
G.J.Perrin at bton.ac.uk
Thu May 14 01:34:32 PDT 2009
> … Every note appears to have a (creation or last modified) date associated
> with it.
> Logically (imho) unscheduled notes should not display a date,
First thought: I agree.
Second thought: what about the date of an alarm? Third thought: we have the
(small) alarm icon. I remain undecided on this…
> and should drop to the bottom of the list.
-1 to sinking without a clean up.
Whilst it's logical for bubbles (typically blue dots) to float items
upwards, I don't like the idea of sinkage.
Wherever possible, avoid making things more complicated than simple triage +
> That way they can be recognised and analysed.
If a thing lacks something (e.g. a schedule), better to simply leave it
> If it is absolutely essential that Chandler shows a date for each note
> then "Unscheduled" should appear as a section between Later and Done.
I'd prefer white space to Unscheduled.
> I am not saying that "Unscheduled" should be part of the triage,
Agreed; triage should be kept uncomplicated.
> just that notes that have not been scheduled should clearly appear,
> visibly, not to have been scheduled. At the moment that isn't the case.
Agreed … and I'll consider the other messages in this topic ASAP. Time to
head to work now.
This discussion is very interesting to me. When I first edited
<http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/DashboardIcons>, for Chandler 1.0.2,
the Summary table: date aspect was the one aspect that really bothered me. I
too often find myself choosing to ignore that column.
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Unscheduled-%27to-do%27-lists.-tp2860329p2888895.html
Sent from the Chandler users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the chandler-users