[chandler-users] Performance: comparing Intel and PowerPC versions of Chandler desktop 1.0.3 RC1 on Mac OS X 10.5.6

Graham Perrin G.J.Perrin at bton.ac.uk
Wed Feb 18 13:17:25 PST 2009

Booting from the same disk but using a greater Mac (with 3 GB RAM), shift key
at log in (I didn't bother with safe mode): 

First launch of Chandler took a few minutes. (Typically: I wait a long time
for Chandler window to appear, then wait a longer time whilst the
application is not responding. Eventually the beach ball clears and the
application is usable.)

Second launch of Chandler was dramatically faster. 

Third launch of Chandler: the application is usable after around eight

All quits remain fairly time-consuming. 

0 (zero) page outs, no swap used

[imac21:~] gjp22% ls -lh /private/var/vm
total 131072
-rw------T  1 root  wheel    64M 18 Feb 20:52 swapfile0

View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Performance%3A-comparing-Intel-and-PowerPC-versions-of-Chandler-desktop-1.0.3-RC1-on-Mac-OS-X-10.5.6-tp2348910p2349428.html
Sent from the Chandler users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the chandler-users mailing list