[chandler-users] Performance: comparing Intel and PowerPC versions of Chandler desktop 1.0.3 RC1 on Mac OS X 10.5.6
G.J.Perrin at bton.ac.uk
Wed Feb 18 13:17:25 PST 2009
Booting from the same disk but using a greater Mac (with 3 GB RAM), shift key
at log in (I didn't bother with safe mode):
First launch of Chandler took a few minutes. (Typically: I wait a long time
for Chandler window to appear, then wait a longer time whilst the
application is not responding. Eventually the beach ball clears and the
application is usable.)
Second launch of Chandler was dramatically faster.
Third launch of Chandler: the application is usable after around eight
All quits remain fairly time-consuming.
0 (zero) page outs, no swap used
[imac21:~] gjp22% ls -lh /private/var/vm
-rw------T 1 root wheel 64M 18 Feb 20:52 swapfile0
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Performance%3A-comparing-Intel-and-PowerPC-versions-of-Chandler-desktop-1.0.3-RC1-on-Mac-OS-X-10.5.6-tp2348910p2349428.html
Sent from the Chandler users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the chandler-users