[chandler-users] Is Chandler the Successor to Lotus Agenda?

[Davor Cubranic]

On Saturday 22 March 2008 15:52:21 Mark A. Weiss wrote:
> Thanks for the response.  I am not a programmer, just a plain old end
> user.  If the ability to parse information to categories on the fly
> is not a core part of Chandler's features, why the talk about it
> being the successor to Agenda?

I don't think I've heard anyone from OSAF make that claim in the last 
five years, if not longer. See blog.osafoundation.org for their (I'm 
just a Chandler user, too) current vision and direction.

Davor