[chandler-users] Some thoughts from new user

[Mimi Yin]

Hi Matt,

Thanks for sending in your feature feedback. (I'll leave the  
performance discussion to others for now.)

We too would love to support basic editing and layout in the Notes  
field. It'd also be great if it recognized URLs! My understanding is  
that there's quite a bit of work to get it going. You can track  
progress on these features in bugzilla here:
- https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7612
- https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11622

There is also a bug for your second request: https:// 
bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11829 (with screenshots  
attached to the bug if you're interested.)

I'm not sure we'll get to either of these features by 1.0, but we're  
certainly taking "frequency of request" into account when  
prioritizing features, so thanks for piping up!

Mimi

On Apr 10, 2008, at 10:53 AM, killerwhale65 wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> First of all i must say i really enjoy using Chandler. I have been  
> looking for something like this for months, and i am glad i finally  
> found it.
>
> I do have 2 feature requests and also a big NO NO for the current  
> version. But lets begin with the feature requests.
>
> 1. It would be nice if the notes that can be attached to any item,  
> would have some basic layouting possibilities: like bold text,  
> background color, font color, tabs ...
>
> 2. It would be VERY VERY nice if in dashboard view, all items would  
> have the background color of their collection (or at least give  
> users this as an option). This could be combined with a sorting  
> option by collection. This way you would have an overview of all  
> your items at once, while still knowing what item belongs to which  
> collection. Now, i have either an overview of all items, but don't  
> know what collection it belongs to, or i should view per  
> collection, but then i dont have an overview of everything. What do  
> you think?
>
> To end with a negative note (this does not make the program  
> negative, like i said above i like it), the program is terribly  
> SLOW! Especially on startup it takes ages. This should not be like  
> this in a modern program running on a modern computer. Also on  
> every action you take while running the program, there is a very  
> noticable delay (but this is not as bad as the startup, but still,  
> i repeat, this should not be like this in a modern program running  
> on a modern computer).
>
> Please reply with your thoughts.
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.11/1368 - Release Date:  
> 9/04/2008 16:20
>
> _______________________________________________
> chandler-users mailing list
> chandler-users at osafoundation.org
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-users/attachments/20080411/64c2e6a1/attachment.htm