[Chandler-dev] [Proposal] Assigning an "Owner" to an item
mimi at osafoundation.org
Fri May 16 12:11:39 PDT 2008
Heh, I think mostly I wasn't clear...
The "Owner" wouldn't change. It's just that the Who-column should
temporarily display who last edited,sent or updated an item so long
as the item is marked Unread. If the item has an Owner, then the Who
column should go back to displaying the Owner attribute as soon as it
is marked "Read".
So it would look something like this:
own Mimi --> Andre edits the item and it is marked Unread for me
ed Andre --> I click on item to see Andre's edits and item is marked
Read for me
On May 16, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Andre Mueninghoff wrote:
> Hi Mimi, I understand and agree readily with all but one piece of
> your proposal, this part:
> > As soon as you've read it however, that information
> > goes away and is replaced by whatever Who-attribute is supposed to
> > appear based on the rules above.
> I am not as informed as you are about the many permutations of
> sharing as it affects owner, but it does not seem intuitive to me
> that Chandler would automatically change the owner (in the Who
> column) for an item merely due to my having read the item.
> It is very possible, I know, that I misunderstand your proposal.
> Mimi Yin wrote:
>> So here's the proposal:
>> 1. Add new "Owner" attribute on the Note-Kind that is blank by
>> default. 2. Who column displays attributes in accordance with the
>> following rules:
>> - Owner, if there is one
>> - From, if incoming email
>> - To, if outgoing email
>> - To, if it's both incoming *and* outgoing email
>> - From, if it's neither incoming *nor* outgoing email
>> - Edited by
>> - Created by
>> 3. I think we still want to keep the "transient" Who column
>> behavior we have today where if an item is edited, sent or updated
>> by somebody else, you see that information in the Who column so
>> long as the item is considered "Unread". As soon as you've read it
>> however, that information goes away and is replaced by whatever
>> Who-attribute is supposed to appear based on the rules above.
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chandler-dev