[Chandler-dev] Bug prioritization for people running own instance
of Cosmo
Katie Capps Parlante
capps at osafoundation.org
Tue Mar 4 12:10:57 PST 2008
Just to follow up...
Randy went through his bug list and moved some bugs between "1.0" and
"1.0 candidate". Basically, we agreed to be conservative about what
makes it onto the "1.0" list -- what bugs are *required* to ship a 1.0
server. Nice-to-haves will go in "1.0 candidate". Randy mentioned that
he'd be using these criteria:
- bugs that are problems for central workflows and/or problems that
we've seen users actually run into (not bugs that are theoretical
problems for edge cases)
- interop bugs that are problematic for iCal and Sunbird/Lightning users
(bugs that block basic usage in line with our scenarios -- not new
features like enterprise scheduling)
Sheila will be updating the work queue so that it includes these "server
1.0" bugs and is generally in sync with bugzilla.
Cheers,
Katie
Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> We should fix this particular bug before releasing a 1.0 server -- put
> it on the queue. I'm assuming we'll have a small set of similar bugs
> that ought to be fixed for a 1.0 server, and I'm assuming that they are
> almost all currently assigned to Randy with a target milestone of 1.0.
> I'll review that list with Randy.
>
> Cheers,
> Katie
>
> Sheila Mooney wrote:
>> As Travis and I were reviewing his bugs and we came across this one
>> which relates to a feature heavily requested by people who are running
>> their own server. We thought it was worth a conversation on the list
>> to determine how we should prioritize these kinds of things in the 1.0
>> timeframe.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7085
>>
>> I would like to hear from people re thoughts on whether we should be
>> just punting all these types of bugs or whether we should be fixing
>> some of them. Should this bug go in the work queue?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sheila
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
More information about the chandler-dev
mailing list