[Chandler-dev] fluid and unconstrained requirements

[Phillip J. Eby]

At 11:15 AM 3/1/2008 -0500, Prajwal Kaflê wrote:
>Philip J Elby said;
>If on the other hand you're referring to the idea that it's difficult
>to develop software when requirements aren't well-defined, then yes,
>that's a valid and well-understood problem.  And if you've read my
>blog or the OSAF blog lately, you'll find lots of information on
>what's been done (and is being done) about that with respect to Chandler.
>
>Yes that is what I'm referring to. I would love to read your blog. I 
>suppose I am revealing my newness to the group in asking this but: 
>how can I get the address to your blog, please?

I rarely post about OSAF or Chandler; I just posted one item that was 
largely a response to Carlos' (Manageability blog) post, and some similar ones:

http://dirtsimple.org/2008/01/rumors-of-chandler-death-are-greatly.html

In general, you'll get more (and more recent) information from the 
Chandler blog:

http://blog.chandlerproject.org/