[Chandler-dev] Re-architecture target in Bugzilla for Desktop
mimi at osafoundation.org
Fri Jul 11 11:27:10 PDT 2008
Well, I'd hate to loose the distinction between 1.0-Candidate bugs
and Future bugs. But perhaps we can use Priority to draw that
On Jul 11, 2008, at 6:22 AM, Grant Baillie wrote:
> Sure, sounds reasonable ... there's an existing "Chandler 2.0"
> target for bugs like that (although I think the only bug assigned
> to it is the master rearchitecture bug).
> On 10 Jul, 2008, at 13:41, Mimi Yin wrote:
>> I was asking Jeffrey about a performance bug in the 0.7future pile
>> (which I am cleaning up) and I wondered aloud if it might not be a
>> good idea to have an re-architecture target. In other words, start
>> flagging bugs that should really be fixed on the new code base as
>> opposed to current code base. I imagine the performance bugs would
>> fall into this category. There are also a bunch of UI refresh
>> issues that might apply as well.
>> Going through such an exercise might help us get a grip on how to
>> scope re-architecture work in the coming months.
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
More information about the chandler-dev