LAST CALL - [Chandler-dev] IRC channels

[Sheila Mooney]

I didn't receive many responses but it seems like people agree on  
trimming some of the channels.

Unless I hear otherwise, going forward we will use #chandler, #cosmo  
and #osaf-staff. We will keep #osaf-notices but stop using the #osaf  
and #osaf-qa channels.

Cheers,
Sheila

On Jan 25, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Brian Kirsch wrote:

> +1 trimming the rest of the channels and leaving #cosmo, #chandler,  
> and #osaf-staff
>
> -Brian
>
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Sheila Mooney wrote:
>
>> Per Katie's email about the list consolidation, I am taking this  
>> discussion to the chandler-dev list which will now handle these  
>> types of issues.
>>
>> Due to the reduction in staff, it's probably worthwhile revisiting  
>> the irc channels we are currently using to see if there are any  
>> that we want to get rid of. Here is the beginning of a proposal.
>>
>> + Keep both the chandler and cosmo channels. I think it's work  
>> keeping both of these since much of the conversations are very  
>> product specific/technical details etc. It makes sense for everyone  
>> to be subscribed to both channels.
>> + We can get rid of the osaf channel. Similarly to the list  
>> proposal, higher level project discussions can just happen in the  
>> chandler channel.
>> + We should probably keep the osaf-staff channel.
>> + There are a few other channels like osaf-qa, osaf-notices(?). I  
>> propose we just get rid of these.
>>
>
> +1 trimming the rest of the channels and leaving #cosmo, #chandler,  
> and #osaf-staff
>
>> Suggestions, comments? Are there any other channels I am forgetting?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sheila
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev