[Chandler-dev] Performance tinderbox plans

[Brian Kirsch]

I say + 1 on shutting them down for now.

Obviously performance is a big concern but we still don't have
a clear direction yet on the desktops future (status quo vs. re- 
architect).

I don't anticipate any paid staffers having the extra cycles to  
maintain these
boxes. This would eventually make a great community project assuming we
had some place to host the boxes safely with in the OSAF organization.


-Brian

On Jan 24, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Jared Rhine wrote:

> What shall we do with the performance tinderboxen?
>
> The previous owner, Heikki Toivonen, told me offline that he's not  
> interested in maintained them.  It's nifty functionality, but it  
> seems like it takes some dedicated time to watch, report,  
> investigate problems.  I can't personally doing a good job with  
> that given other responsibilities.  From a systems side, shutting  
> them off would save the power, KVM slots, and maintenance.  The  
> room the performance tinderbox are in needs to be emptied and right  
> now I don't have a physical place to put them.
>
> So I propose shutting off the performance tinderbox.
>
> To keep them on, we'd need to find a willing volunteer to maintain  
> them and also we'd need to find a physical/network home for them.
>
> -- Jared
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev