[Chandler-dev] Bug prioritization for people running own instance of Cosmo

[Katie Capps Parlante]

1.0 Server should be included in the Web Work Queue (mostly it already 
is, but we need to add bugs like this one and others on Randy's plate).

Cheers,
Katie

Mimi Yin wrote:
> Katie,
> 
> I'm assuming 1.0 Server is different from the 1.0 Desktop Work Q that 
> requires some amount of work on the web UI and server end?
> 
> Mimi
> 
> On Feb 28, 2008, at 1:54 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> 
>> We should fix this particular bug before releasing a 1.0 server -- put 
>> it on the queue. I'm assuming we'll have a small set of similar bugs 
>> that ought to be fixed for a 1.0 server, and I'm assuming that they 
>> are almost all currently assigned to Randy with a target milestone of 
>> 1.0. I'll review that list with Randy.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Katie
>>
>> Sheila Mooney wrote:
>>> As Travis and I were reviewing his bugs and we came across this one 
>>> which relates to a feature heavily requested by people who are 
>>> running their own server. We thought it was worth a conversation on 
>>> the list to determine how we should prioritize these kinds of things 
>>> in the 1.0 timeframe.
>>> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7085
>>> I would like to hear from people re thoughts on whether we should be 
>>> just punting all these types of bugs or whether we should be fixing 
>>> some of them. Should this bug go in the work queue?
>>> Cheers,
>>> Sheila
>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
>>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
>>
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
> 
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> 
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev