[Chandler-dev] Bug prioritization for people running own instance of Cosmo

[Mimi Yin]

Katie,

I'm assuming 1.0 Server is different from the 1.0 Desktop Work Q that  
requires some amount of work on the web UI and server end?

Mimi

On Feb 28, 2008, at 1:54 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:

> We should fix this particular bug before releasing a 1.0 server --  
> put it on the queue. I'm assuming we'll have a small set of similar  
> bugs that ought to be fixed for a 1.0 server, and I'm assuming that  
> they are almost all currently assigned to Randy with a target  
> milestone of 1.0. I'll review that list with Randy.
>
> Cheers,
> Katie
>
> Sheila Mooney wrote:
>> As Travis and I were reviewing his bugs and we came across this  
>> one which relates to a feature heavily requested by people who are  
>> running their own server. We thought it was worth a conversation  
>> on the list to determine how we should prioritize these kinds of  
>> things in the 1.0 timeframe.
>> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7085
>> I would like to hear from people re thoughts on whether we should  
>> be just punting all these types of bugs or whether we should be  
>> fixing some of them. Should this bug go in the work queue?
>> Cheers,
>> Sheila
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev