[Chandler-dev] Bug prioritization for people running own instance of Cosmo

[Katie Capps Parlante]

We should release a 1.0 Server in the same timeframe.

Cheers,
Katie

Mimi Yin wrote:
> I think we should fix this scenario as it is pretty basic to people 
> running their own servers. (The whole point being you want something 
> more private, more secure, more under control than the Hub service.)
> 
> But I don't know that we need to fix this in the 1.0 timeframe, which is 
> really defined around 1.0 for Desktop users and Collaborators of Desktop 
> users.
> 
> Mimi
> 
> On Feb 28, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Sheila Mooney wrote:
> 
>> As Travis and I were reviewing his bugs and we came across this one 
>> which relates to a feature heavily requested by people who are running 
>> their own server. We thought it was worth a conversation on the list 
>> to determine how we should prioritize these kinds of things in the 1.0 
>> timeframe.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7085
>>
>> I would like to hear from people re thoughts on whether we should be 
>> just punting all these types of bugs or whether we should be fixing 
>> some of them. Should this bug go in the work queue?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sheila
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
> 
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> 
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev