[Chandler-dev] Bug prioritization for people running own instance of Cosmo

[Katie Capps Parlante]

We should fix this particular bug before releasing a 1.0 server -- put 
it on the queue. I'm assuming we'll have a small set of similar bugs 
that ought to be fixed for a 1.0 server, and I'm assuming that they are 
almost all currently assigned to Randy with a target milestone of 1.0. 
I'll review that list with Randy.

Cheers,
Katie

Sheila Mooney wrote:
> As Travis and I were reviewing his bugs and we came across this one 
> which relates to a feature heavily requested by people who are running 
> their own server. We thought it was worth a conversation on the list to 
> determine how we should prioritize these kinds of things in the 1.0 
> timeframe.
> 
> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7085
> 
> I would like to hear from people re thoughts on whether we should be 
> just punting all these types of bugs or whether we should be fixing some 
> of them. Should this bug go in the work queue?
> 
> Cheers,
> Sheila
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> 
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev