[Chandler-dev] Web widgets strategy and proposal

[Sheila Mooney]

Travis,

Thanks for responding. We hadn't discussed making the "mini cal +  
preview" and "simple list view" available to non-logged in people  
before - URLifying them, I guess is another way to describe it. I  
wanted to make sure this wasn't totally unreasonable.

Per Mimi's reply we may shuffle around the priorities. I will also  
make sure we get more clarity around the notifications but for now it  
looks like we would move on to the editable detail view first.

Cheers,
Sheila

On Feb 13, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Travis Vachon wrote:

>>
>> Proposal
>>
>> + Get the quick item entry widget working first. This is very  
>> useful for the desktop user and high-bandwidth collaborator. It can  
>> be put in lots of places - Mimi will talk more about this.
>> + The second priority would be the email notifications. Dashboard  
>> users and sharees receive an email summarizing the changes that  
>> have been made to a particular collection. This reaches out to  
>> support mobile devices and enhances the experience for regular users.
>> + Implement the editable detail view. This is a great hook where  
>> the desktop users can reach out to others.
>> + Implement the simple list view in a way they can be viewed by non  
>> Chandler users as well as Chandler users. It would be really useful  
>> to share a list with others they can edit anonymously in the same  
>> way a detail view is.
>> + Implement the mini cal and preview pane so they can be viewed by  
>> non Chandler users as well as Chandler users.
>>
>> The goal of this proposal is to support the people who have already  
>> bought into Chandler and improve the ability to reach out to more  
>> who don't have a clue but might find over time that they are  
>> targets for our other core features.
>>
>
> Most of this sounds pretty reasonable to me. The email notifications  
> bit seems heavier on server work, and afaik was considered second  
> tier work on Jared's plate. If we really want to prioritize it as  
> such we should probably reconsider our current plan of record on  
> that front.
>
> I think the order for the last three items on the list works fine,  
> though the simple list view is likely to be simpler and faster out  
> the door in a useful way.
>
> Overall I'm +0 on the specifics, and would be +1 if I had a better  
> idea about our plan for notifications.
>
> -Travis
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20080213/2c0fcab5/attachment.htm