[Chandler-dev] Bug fixes to consider putting in 1.0
mimi at osafoundation.org
Fri Aug 1 17:18:26 PDT 2008
On Aug 1, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Grant Baillie wrote:
> FWIW, I've r+'ed Jeffrey's fixes to 12262 and 12256: They should go
> in 1.0 along with the "repository in use" auto-reload bug on
> Windows. rc2 anyone?
> On 30 Jul, 2008, at 16:23, Jeffrey Harris wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>> With Grant returning tomorrow, I wanted to start a conversation
>> about whether we should spin a 1.0rc2, and what bug fixes should
>> go in.
>> Sheila mentioned that she'd like Grant to make the decision about
>> what's safe to go in and what's not, which sounds good to me.
>> I do think we probably should spin an rc2, although I know we'd
>> really like to ship 1.0. Here are my nominations for fixes to put
>> Outlook fix - https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?
>> Emails from Chandler with empty bodies are, in some variety of
>> Microsoft mail clients, displaying our theoretically hidden EIM
>> payload. This isn't a big deal but it's ugly, and the fix is a
>> very safe addition of a bit of whitespace.
>> URL fix - https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12256
>> The recent URL detection code didn't work with URLs that stretched
>> over multiple lines. My fix to find multi-line-URLs unfortunately
>> has a flaw: if a URL appears on the first line, all whitespace
>> after the item body is seen as matching that first line, which
>> makes for a disconcertingly large click target for that url (and
>> makes it hard to edit the body if it happens to contain just a url
>> and nothing else).
>> This is also only a minor annoyance, but a very safe fix.
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
More information about the chandler-dev