[Chandler-dev] Reviving the DESKTOP Test Automation Project

Aparna Kadakia aparna at osafoundation.org
Tue Sep 11 09:57:59 PDT 2007


Remote people can dial into my bridge for this meeting:

1-800-391-1709
Bridge : 465838

Date/Time : Today, Sept 11 2007 at 2:30 PM in Shambala

Thanks
Aparna

On Sep 5, 2007, at 8:55 PM, Aparna Kadakia wrote:

> Much in line with Katie's email, I too have been agonizing over the  
> Desktop Test Automation project lately. THe last few weeks have  
> been rather painful as we have manually gone thru the test specs to  
> validate the release. Clearly we need to make some kind of a  
> decision on the test framework for Desktop soon, esp in the light  
> of shorter release cycles.
>
> Over the last 3 years, we have seen CATS, the CPIA script based  
> test automation framework and then more recently the Script/ 
> Recording framework, both trying to fill the gap of insufficient UI  
> automated tests with easy test development. Even though CATS is a  
> full-blown fully functional test framework, the test development  
> requires adding methods to its libraries which require good  
> understanding of the internal architecture of the component under  
> test. This turned out to be not so scalable after all.
> To overcome this handicap, John initiated the effort on Script/ 
> Recording framework. It is still premature to comment on how  
> successful this is as it is far from complete. We still have a  
> number of significant things to add support for e.g. dragging in  
> cal canvas, support for modal dialogs etc. It is important to  
> remember that the framework we adopt needs to support testing at  
> the UI level and not within. This is more for functional testing  
> which covers scenarios rather than unit level testing.
>
> Since John will be back in the office next week and we will have  
> wrapped up the Preview release, I propose we re-start the  
> discussion on the Desktop test automation again.
>
> The plan is to evaluate the progress on script/recording framework  
> and if it is a viable next option. Also the idea is to analyze  
> collectively if any architectural changes are necessary to build a  
> more reliable test system.
>
> Proposed Date : Tuesday, Sept 11 2007
> Proposed Time : 2:30 PM (taking the Design Discussion slot since we  
> aren't having those)
> Conference Room : Shambala
>
> The high level goals of the automation framework remain the same:
> 1. easy UI test development
> 2. easy debugging of test failures (capturing and outputting  
> errors, stack traces in log files etc)
> 3. very clear passed and failed results from test execution
> 4. flexibility of running a single test v/s a full suite
> 5. easy installation of the framework and  execution of testscripts
>
> Let me know if that works for everyone.
>
> Thanks
> Aparna
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20070911/9daa9a13/attachment.html


More information about the chandler-dev mailing list