[Chandler-dev] What is next for Chandler desktop?

[Phillip J. Eby]

At 09:59 AM 9/6/2007 -1000, Brian Kirsch wrote:
>Preview was
>targeted for March but is shipping in September. Given this fact,
>it is high risk to tackle any major architecture changes at this point.

Actually, I would have thought that would be considered evidence of 
the risks involved in NOT making a major architecture change.  ;-)


>Now that we have reached Preview, it is my opinion that the focus should
>be squarely on improving and augmenting the user level feature set
>based on adopter feedback.  Given that the current funding window is
>closing it seems the best use of developer resources.

...for what ultimate *goal*?  This statement presupposes a goal and 
values, but doesn't make them explicit.  Best for what?  For 
whom?  To accomplish what?  Let's be specific about the intended end 
result, because otherwise the discussion is likely to go around in circles.

Specifically, what do you want to see happening *after* the funding 
window has closed?