[Chandler-dev] What is next for Chandler desktop?

[Reid Ellis]

On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> - Perhaps we shouldn't be storing UI items in the repository. Yes,  
> transparently persisting UI state is in theory a cool property, but  
> in practice I don't know that we are effectively getting the  
> persistence right and it perhaps comes at too great a cost.

On 5 Sep, 2007, at 14:47, D John Anderson wrote:
> Are you proposing that we don't use transparent persistence for  
> storing blocks and other associated UI data structures?

On Sep 5, 2007, at 20:03, Grant Baillie wrote:
> Yes, that is the suggestion/proposal.

+1 to separating the UI data from the model data.

Reid

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20070905/d268dbdc/attachment.html