[Chandler-dev] What is next for Chandler desktop?

Grant Baillie grant at osafoundation.org
Wed Sep 5 17:03:29 PDT 2007

On 5 Sep, 2007, at 14:47, D John Anderson wrote:

> On Sep 5, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
>> - Perhaps we shouldn't be storing UI items in the repository. Yes,
>> transparently persisting UI state is in theory a cool property,  
>> but in
>> practice I don't know that we are effectively getting the persistence
>> right and it perhaps comes at too great a cost.
> Are you proposing that we don't use transparent persistence for  
> storing blocks and other associated UI data structures?

Yes, that is the suggestion/proposal.


More information about the chandler-dev mailing list