[Chandler-dev] Architecture Pilot Project Proposal

[Heikki Toivonen]

Grant Baillie wrote:
> Explicit non-goals:
> 
> * Persistence layer: i.e. not saving user data (import from a format
> like .ics is possible, especially for performance testing purposes).
> * Sharing/email import.
> 
> The lack of persistence is likely to be controversial in some quarters.

You could say! :) Or maybe I did not understand the high level plan. Let
me clarify: Is the plan to have testable, scriptable, extensible,
high-performance Chandler UI that does not save anything anywhere
(except RAM)? That is quite a bit different from what I thought the
project was going to be.

Still, I do see some value in that, and if you can really pull all that
off in 2 months I am not worried one way or another.

So assuming for a moment that I understood correctly, is the next step
after that finding a backend that meets the performance etc.
requirements of that non-persistent-Chandler?

-- 
  Heikki Toivonen


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20071015/7c2ad489/signature.pgp