[Chandler-dev] [Sum] The Great Architecture Discussion of 2007
grant at osafoundation.org
Tue Oct 9 16:59:13 PDT 2007
On 9 Oct, 2007, at 16:12, Andi Vajda wrote:
>> 4. implementing a generic database inside another generic database
> That was the goal, originally. Not to have a hard compiled app
> against a hard compiled relational schema. If Chandler is to become
> a hard compiled application with a static schema, where all data
> types have to be determined in advance, then of course, the
> chandler repository is overkill and can be replaced by some
> specifically optimized, domain-specific, schema.
I'm confused: How is what we have (where you have to throw out your
data any time the schema at either of 2 levels changes) different
from the "hard compiled app against a hard compiled relational
schema"? (Apart from the word "relational").
More information about the chandler-dev