[Chandler-dev] Week-view

[Phillip J. Eby]

At 05:32 PM 11/23/2007 -0800, Brian Moseley wrote:
>On Nov 23, 2007 4:41 PM, Marcus Sundman <sundman at iki.fi> wrote:
>
> > Huh? Whose intelligence have I belittled?!? OK, maybe I was a bit hard
> > on that hypothetical person who made this hypothetical interface that I
> > only partly imagined might have existed. Oh, and I was (justifiably)
> > hard on the MS people who designed PowerPoint.
> >
> > If you meant something other than the above then please provide an
> > exact quote or give some other support of the rather harsh accusations
> > you imply. If it turns out I really did write something unjustifiable or
> > unfair then I'd apologize sincerely because it certainly wasn't my
> > intention. If, OTOH, you come to the conclusion that your interpretation
> > that I was confrontational and belittling was your own imagination then
> > I wouldn't mind getting an apology from you. Does this sound fair?
>
>here are some sample phrases:
>
>"utterly useless"
>"hysterical about week- and month-overviews"
>"can't fathom not having the same limitations"
>"morons at MS"
>"I don't think you've thought this through"
>"complete moron"
>
>if you really think that we are going to be receptive to the attitude
>conveyed by this kind of language, you're mistaken. we're interested
>in ideas for improvement, but what you're doing is the equivalent of
>bursting into a room shouting expletives and generally acting like a
>boor. show some respect and moderate your tone if you want to be taken
>seriously.

It also doesn't help that this thread is off-topic for the 
Chandler-Dev list.  I believe feature idea discussion and 
prioritization belong on the Chandler-Users or Design lists.