[Chandler-dev] IRC QA session, Wednesday May 16th 11:00 AM PDT

[Andre Mueninghoff]

Hi Aparna, I migrated with this continuous build of Chandler (after
initially running into the same problem I think that Priscilla did with
the initially recommended checkpoint build):

Chandler_win_debug_0.7.dev-r14328-20070516104911.exe

Thanks, Andre


On Wed, 16 May 2007 15:51:56 -0700, "Aparna Kadakia"
<aparna at osafoundation.org> said:
> Hi Andre,
> Thank you for taking the leap here on migrating your data to Chandler  
> Hub.
> Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
> 
> See my comments inline:
> 
> On May 16, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Andre Mueninghoff wrote:
> 
> > Hi everyone,
> > I've migrated successfully to Chander Hub. It was a relatively  
> > seamless
> > process. The only very minor issues I would raise are 1) Chandler  
> > (debug
> > build r14228 on WinXP) is not (hasn't for awhile) displaying the  
> > sharing
> > type icon next to the collection name unless one selects a collection
> > and then the sharing icon for only that collection is displayed (if
> > there is one to display). This just means that I have to highlight
> > collection names one by one to verify the unsubscribe from osaf.us and
> > the publish to hub.chandlerproject.org.
> Yes, it's a blocker bug currently.
> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8791
> 
> > Might be good to mention this in
> > the migration instructions.
> Good point. If the bug is not resolved by the time we are ready to  
> migrate the dogfooders we will document it clearly in the migration  
> instructions. Thank you for pointing that out.
> 
> > 2) The same Chandler is not (hasn't for
> > awhile) displaying the build number in the About dialogue. Might
> > interfere with verification of the Chandler one is using. Maybe these
> > are debug build issues only.
> 
> There is already an open bug about the version number not displaying  
> in the continous builds.
> https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8747
> 
> Andre, can you tell me whether you are using a checkpoint build or a  
> continuous build?
> Or if you post the contents of your version.py that will tell us for  
> sure.
> 
> > Congrats on releasing Cosmo 0.6.1 and
> > EIMML. I think it would fair to characterize the difference between  
> > the
> > previous DAV sync speed and the new EIMML sync speed as the difference
> > between impulse power and warp power. :-)
> > Best regards, Andre
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 15 May 2007 22:35:59 -0700, "Aparna Kadakia"
> > <aparna at osafoundation.org> said:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >> This is a reminder about tomorrow's IRC QA session at 11:00 AM PDT in
> >> #cosmo channel.
> >> We will be focussing on getting the internal dogfooders to migrate
> >> their data from osaf.us to Chandler Hub which is now on our newly
> >> released Cosmo 0.6.1 release.
> >>
> >> Here are the instructions for the end-users migrating their data from
> >> [osaf.us+DAV] sharing to [hub.chandlerproject.org+EIM] sharing.
> >> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Projects/DavToEimMigrationUserDoc
> >>
> >> Part of the objective of the test session is to also validate the
> >> steps identified in the document. The document supports both a4 and
> >> trunk users looking to migrate their data to the new server.
> >>
> >> The Chandler Checkpoint build that is recommended in the migration
> >> instructions is r14323 and can be downloaded at:
> >> http://downloads.osafoundation.org/chandler/snapshots/20070515/
> >>
> >> Again, we will be conducting this session in the #cosmo channel at
> >> 11:00 AM PDT.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Aparna
> >> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> >>
> >> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> >> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
>