[Chandler-dev] attachments vs. multipart-alternative

[Brian Kirsch]

Yup, I think we are in agreement that seeing the Chandler eimml  
attachment
is of no benefit to Email Client users.

I have made the eimml a multipart/alternative part which effectively  
hides
the eimml from the users mail readers.

The ICS will continue to be visible as an attachment on Chandler  
Task / Events.

The change will be checked in today.


-Brian


On Jun 14, 2007, at 4:28 PM, Reid Ellis wrote:

> On Jun 14, 2007, at 18:06, Jeffrey Harris wrote:
>> [..] I'm only advocating that we move EIMML to multipart/alternative.
>
> +1
>
> Seeing EIMML attachments is very reminiscent (in a bad way) of  
> "WINMAIL.DAT" attachments. In comparison, ics files are at this  
> point familliar and easily dealt with.
>
> Reid
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20070615/b8a47586/attachment.htm