[Chandler-dev] attachments vs. multipart-alternative

[Reid Ellis]

On Jun 14, 2007, at 18:06, Jeffrey Harris wrote:
> [..] I'm only advocating that we move EIMML to multipart/alternative.

+1

Seeing EIMML attachments is very reminiscent (in a bad way) of  
"WINMAIL.DAT" attachments. In comparison, ics files are at this point  
familliar and easily dealt with.

Reid

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20070614/eba06c8f/attachment.html