[Chandler-dev] Edit/Update

Philippe Bossut pbossut at osafoundation.org
Wed Jan 17 22:42:39 PST 2007


We had a long IRC chat followed by an as long conf call today. Lots of 
ground has been covered and issues mentioned that need design work. I 
tried to summarized some of it here:

I left the discussion unfold and people explore various issues since it 
was important for all to understand the problem in all its complex 
glory. Clearly, recurring items are making this really tricky. Without 
falling into a silly "let's make it simple" managerial non-sense, I'd 
like to remind a couple of things though:
- We can choose to cut corners for Preview and not solve all the 
possible cases. Switching back to the current "last change win" (and 
data loss...) when the complexity escalate is a solution we have at hand.
- Let's try to have a workable solution for the most likely cases and 
agree to be less than optimal in the rare case. e.g., a 3 way conflict 
will be rare enough than asking the user to solve them sequentially 
(conflict with A first, then conflict with B) is OK though inelegant 
(potentially asking to resolve a conflict on the same field/attribute 

With that being said, thanks for the great discussion. Feel free to 
modify the Wiki (actually, if you have tasks with dependencies on 
others, you *need* to put them in the wiki...) and talk to you again 
tomorrow 11am on IRC (minus PJE and Brian who won't be able to join us).

- Philippe

More information about the chandler-dev mailing list