[Chandler-dev] Recurrence merging issues
grant at osafoundation.org
Mon Feb 26 15:21:17 PST 2007
On 26 Feb, 2007, at 14:42, Morgen Sagen wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Jeffrey Harris wrote:
>> Grant and I discussed several ways of fixing this. We could doing
>> restore in parallel, and instead queue up all the collections to be
>> subscribed to. This would slow down share restore, but would lead to
>> fewer merge errors.
> I think this also means never having more than one sharing
> operation going at any given time, including background syncs, and
> subscribes, right?
Well, it can still happen in the (probably) rare case where the user
changes an item "at the same time as" a background sync, and the main
thread's refresh runs into a conflict.
More information about the chandler-dev