[Chandler-dev] Recurrence merging issues

[Grant Baillie]

On 26 Feb, 2007, at 14:42, Morgen Sagen wrote:

> On Feb 26, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Jeffrey Harris wrote:
>
>> Grant and I discussed several ways of fixing this.  We could doing  
>> share
>> restore in parallel, and instead queue up all the collections to be
>> subscribed to.  This would slow down share restore, but would lead to
>> fewer merge errors.
>
> I think this also means never having more than one sharing  
> operation going at any given time, including background syncs, and  
> subscribes, right?

Well, it can still happen in the (probably) rare case where the user  
changes an item "at the same time as" a background sync, and the main  
thread's refresh runs into a conflict.

--Grant