[Chandler-dev] Yet another proposal for Chandler plugins

[D John Anderson]

+1

On Feb 13, 2007, at 10:19 PM, Davor Cubranic wrote:

> Ted Leung wrote:
>> On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>
>>> At least having README's and buildable plugins goes a good way  
>>> towards having examples that others can tinker with.  Improved  
>>> ability to tinker (e.g. the menu proposal) is also helpful.   
>>> Arguably, good tinkering support is at least as important as  
>>> reference documentation and tutorials, which we already have  
>>> several of.
>>>
>>> Obviously, all documentation can always be improved, but in terms  
>>> of rounding out what we have, Andi's proposal does help to fill  
>>> out one of the weaker spots.
>>
>> Andi solicited feedback on his proposal and I gave it.  If you  
>> guys want to ignore it, that's your perogative.
>
> Tinkering is easier, in my opinion, when you can just 'cd' to the  
> directory with plugins and view them directly with your editor.  
> Packaging them in eggs adds that extra layer of work that makes it  
> a little more difficult to have a peek at the source when I want to.
>
> Davor
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev