[Chandler-dev] Yet another proposal for Chandler plugins

[Davor Cubranic]

Ted Leung wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>
>> At least having README's and buildable plugins goes a good way 
>> towards having examples that others can tinker with.  Improved 
>> ability to tinker (e.g. the menu proposal) is also helpful.  
>> Arguably, good tinkering support is at least as important as 
>> reference documentation and tutorials, which we already have several of.
>>
>> Obviously, all documentation can always be improved, but in terms of 
>> rounding out what we have, Andi's proposal does help to fill out one 
>> of the weaker spots.
>
> Andi solicited feedback on his proposal and I gave it.  If you guys 
> want to ignore it, that's your perogative.

Tinkering is easier, in my opinion, when you can just 'cd' to the 
directory with plugins and view them directly with your editor. 
Packaging them in eggs adds that extra layer of work that makes it a 
little more difficult to have a peek at the source when I want to.

Davor